Hi Squad
Tough choice, but I vote for another go at this one.
> What did Pirsig mean by the terms dynamic and static quality, what is the
> relationship
> between them, and did he posit them as the actual nature of reality or just
> a more useful interpretation of reality than the subject-object split?
>
> Is this static-dynamic split merely an epistemic convenience that we make
> arbitrarily or is it an ontological reality, transcending our thoughts and
> intellectual description of it?
Or was that two?
Magnus
MOQ Online - http://www.moq.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Jan 17 2002 - 13:08:36 GMT