Quality in the first sense is what makes us happy but within moral
boundaries however ZMM was made for you yourself to journey to actual find
yourself and not into others. Lila was made to judge more of moral
characters and not what makes one happy.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2001 10:49 AM
Subject: RE: MD An Introduction to the Metaphysics of Quality
> Marc wrote
> > The good part of LC in my opinion is that it can be the Static
> > Pattern, like Pirsig wrote.
> > Yes, LC is quite dull, as are most intellectual Scientific Books. It
> > matter.
> > Even Jimi Hendrix would not be able to explain E=MC2 well and also make
> > artistically Dynamic. Different kind of qualities, you know.
> Oh how I disagree! Have you read Richard Dawkins on evolution? Steven
Pinker on the workings of the mind? How about David Deutsh's
> explanation of wave-light duality "Shadows"? It's one of the most
beautiful pieces of writing I've ever read. Perfectly scientific
> and perfectly artistic at the same time.
> MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
> Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
> MD Queries - firstname.lastname@example.org
> To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - email@example.com
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:01:17 BST