on 9/23/02 11:57 AM, Platt Holden brought forth the following from the
> Social and intellectual static patterns are subject to influence by DQ,
> but static inorganic and biological patterns are no longer in flux, i.e.,
> they are universally fixed by nature. Man can tinker with DNA and
> create unnatural life forms, not as a result of DQ, but of amoral intellect
> run amok. Nanotechnology threatens the physical make up of the
> universe, but if as a result we all disappear into a black hole it won't be
> DQ's fault.
I think it's still up in the air whether there are universal, fixed laws of
nature or not. Certainly, there are many scientists and philosophers who
believe otherwise. Furthermore, I would think that DQ is a little more
sovereign than that.
Another point about this that bothers me: if inorganic and biological static
patterns of value are "fixed by nature" does that mean they are in some
sense "out there?" That makes me feel like we're getting a little too close
to SOM territory.
-- Matt Brown (email@example.com) cs1321 Head TA Ga Tech PST Undergrad Philosophy Society Chairman http://thm.askee.net Society of Physics Students Member -= "Every day is a good day" - Zen Proverb =-
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/ MD Queries - firstname.lastname@example.org
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at: http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 25 2002 - 16:06:34 BST