maybe I am just ignorant or something but weren't there a few people in the
US that voted for this man and is therefore the representation of democracy
of the US? Shouldn't the question be;''why did all these people vote in
favour of Bush? I think this whole dumb/smart discussion completely misses
MOQ perspective, don't you? Shouldn't the discussion be focused at why an
intellectual pattern(democracy) has degenerated into Bush?(ok a bit rigid,
I'll admit) or how well Bush upholds the fundamental values of the free
>From: Nathan Lund <email@example.com>
>Subject: Re: MD Bush Troops
>Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 14:05:46 -0700 (PDT)
>I think there's much confusion here. Many highly-intellegent individuals
>have tendencies to be buffoons. Maybe Bush is smart. But I don't concede
>that he's a wise or effective leader, wihch is to say -- in terms of
>political leadership and as a maker of highly moral decisions /
>disseminator of their concequences -- I think he's one dumb motherfucker.
>Do you Yahoo!?
>New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo!
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - firstname.lastname@example.org
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 25 2002 - 16:06:35 BST