From: ml (mbtlehn@ix.netcom.com)
Date: Wed Sep 15 2004 - 05:48:54 BST
If "experientially advanced" is at all possible to
interpret as adaptation/adapted, the both the
cockroach and bacteria might give us some run
for the money. Plants also have an immense
chemical pallette of experience...
But then of course, we are now coming into a
position to learn from "their experience"...
we will add your cultural and technological
distinctiveness to our own... comes to mind.
Read should make for an interesting read,
so to speak.
thanks--mel
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Morey" <us@divadeus.freeserve.co.uk>
To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 1:29 PM
Subject: Re: MD Evolution
> Geoffrey Read writes, (Pirsig couldn't put it better himself:)
>
> "When some of the debris circling a nascent sun coalesced to form plant
> earth the most
> experientially advanced organism upon it was a molecule. Today, some 4.5
> billion years
> later, it is a human being."
>
> Comments?
> DM
>
>
>
> MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
> Mail Archives:
> Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
> Nov '02 Onward -
http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
> MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
>
> To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
> http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
>
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Sep 15 2004 - 06:06:51 BST