From: ml (mbtlehn@ix.netcom.com)
Date: Tue Oct 26 2004 - 05:27:57 BST
Hello Mark:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Steven Heyman" <markheyman@infoproconsulting.com>
To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2004 9:34 PM
Subject: Re: MD On Faith
> On 25 Oct 2004 at 18:29, Erin wrote:
> Hi,
> I am not trying to give you a hard time mel. I am just truly
> confused athow you distinguish these things.I'm getting dizzy
> trying to figure out what the heck your argument is.....remind mewhy
> you justify your belief in MOQ is not faith with the claimthat it
> falls asRATIONAL empiricism and thenwith this new statement shun
> rational label as SOM and seemingly start to describe arealm of
> beyondunderstanding whichwas how you described faith.
>
> msh says:
> You're confused because you are mixing up responses from two
> different people. MSH is not MEL.
> Mel thinks that rejecting SOM means rejecting rationalism, a position
> so clearly refuted by a variety of contributors to this list that
> it's hard to understand why he still clings to it.
> Just take a little time to examine a posting and see who's saying
> what, before responding. You also might want to consider labelling
> sections of your posts with things like "mel said:" , "erin says:"
> "msh says:" This will make it a lot easier for all of us to
> determining who's saying what in response to whom.
>
mel:
Not quite sure where you got that from...rejecting the rational?
Hardly, just got to know when to use is and how...
As for "-isms," getting stuck in any is low quality, but then again
we all live to be categorized by you.... ;-)
thanks--mel
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Oct 26 2004 - 10:23:27 BST