From: Erin (macavity11@yahoo.com)
Date: Fri Oct 29 2004 - 14:45:10 BST
I was wondering if people answer this in the context of the analogy that was given earlier about Pirsig's point is that we have another sense for quality/value. I am not sure if I understand that. Senses are separating information, so the light- vision, sound- hearing, etc. so if you make the value-Quality sense, it seems like you are doing a split that you shouldn't be doing if value really is the "groundstuff".
Erin
Platt Holden <pholden@sc.rr.com> wrote:
> msh says:
> Why do people sometimes disagree about the
> objects in which Quality resides?
Quality resides in objects? Or in the "eye of the beholder?" I think
Pirsig addresses this perennial question, but I can't find where. Anyone
know where he gives a definitive answer? Perhaps Quality "resides" in both
subject and object? If so, what's the relationship?
Thanks.
Platt
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Oct 29 2004 - 16:29:40 BST