RE: MD On Transcendence

From: Chuck Roghair (ctr@pacificpartssales.com)
Date: Mon Nov 08 2004 - 19:48:41 GMT

  • Next message: David Buchanan: "RE: MD James, Pirsig, Mysticism"

    David:

    Are you referring to something specific in the MoQ as far as "transcendence"
    goes?

    Yours is an interesting question. Initially, I say the MoQ leans toward the
    intrisically esoteric, rather than the transcendent, but I wonder if there
    isn't a specific exchange, thread or passage which may have birthed such
    woolgathering.

    This may keep up me at night.

    Best regards,

    Chuck

    -----Original Message-----
    From: owner-moq_discuss@venus.co.uk [mailto:owner-moq_discuss@venus.co.uk]
    On Behalf Of David Morey
    Sent: Monday, November 08, 2004 10:17 AM
    To: moq_discuss@moq.org
    Subject: Re: MD On Transcendence

    Hi all

    Is there any use for the concept of transcendence
    in the MOQ? If not is this an error in the MOQ?
    If not an error why not?

    David M

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Nov 08 2004 - 20:47:45 GMT