Fw: MD terror & religion

From: Sam Norton (elizaphanian@kohath.wanadoo.co.uk)
Date: Tue Nov 09 2004 - 12:07:31 GMT

  • Next message: Sam Norton: "Fw: MD Galileo"

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Sam Norton" <elizaphanian@kohath.wanadoo.co.uk>
    To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    Sent: Sunday, November 07, 2004 3:56 PM
    Subject: Re: MD terror & religion

    > Hi DMB,
    >
    > > dmb sez:
    > > Yes, I very much liked that "ill-informed diatribe". Harris asserted some of
    > > the most central points that I've been making here in recent weeks. It was
    > > like hearing an echo. (You really should stop characterizing everyone who
    > > disagrees with you as ignorant and bigoted.)
    >
    > As a matter of fact, I don't. There are lots of people here who disagree with me, but their points
    > of view tend to be both well-informed and open-minded. For as long as your point of view doesn't
    > qualify under those headings, I will continue to tease you about it ;-)
    >
    > > Sam explained:
    > > These sorts of thinkers, so it seems to me, are merely replicating the
    > > 'hippy' problem that Pirsig talks about - they are cutting out the ground
    > > from under their feet. Wherever we end up, it will have to be an ideology
    > > that affirms elements of the social level, otherwise we truly are doomed.
    > >
    > > dmb says:
    > > Right. Harris is a hippy. The interview made it clear that he was all into
    > > tuning in, dropping out, free love and organic farming. Again, Sam, I think
    > > you're being quite ridiculous. Harris is not confused about the distinction
    > > between biology and the mystical, as Pirsig describes the hippy failure. He
    > > is not rejecting social and intellectual patterns either.
    >
    > You didn't pick up that the word hippy had quotes around it. The point was not to do with free
    love
    > but the necessity of the social level where I think Harris - and you in so far as you share his
    > perspective - have a problem.
    >
    > Tell you what, as it seems to me that the perennial philosophy etc is virtually solipsistic and
    akin
    > to spiritual masturbation, why don't you outline how it does support the social level? I don't
    think
    > that it is capable of supporting the social level, but I'm happy to concede that you know more
    about
    > it than me. So how does it do so?
    >
    > Sam
    >

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Nov 09 2004 - 16:07:29 GMT