Re: MD Pure experience and the Kantian problematic

From: Erin (macavity11@yahoo.com)
Date: Sun Feb 13 2005 - 20:48:02 GMT

Next message: Ron Winchester: "Re: MD Pure experience and the Kantian problematic"

Previous message: David Buchanan: "RE: MD Is the MoQ still in the Kantosphere?"
In reply to: MarshaV: "Re: MD Pure experience and the Kantian problematic"
Reply: Scott Roberts: "Re: MD Pure experience and the Kantian problematic"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

I haven't been following this thread closely so I am not clear where this hypothesis request started. Is it a request to put everything you believe in one working hypothesis or am I missing something. If it is, it is interesting request, and I would love to see others' hypotheses. Seems like a hard request, not sure how I would word it myself. Seems like a good challenge for the others to do.
Erin

MarshaV <marshalz@charter.net> wrote:
At 09:51 AM 2/13/2005 -0700, you wrote:

>Form is formlessness, formlessness is form.
>
>- Scott

Scott,

Uncle. But do let me know when you get a website or elist dedicated to
your theory.

Marsha

MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

Next message: Ron Winchester: "Re: MD Pure experience and the Kantian problematic"
Previous message: David Buchanan: "RE: MD Is the MoQ still in the Kantosphere?"
In reply to: MarshaV: "Re: MD Pure experience and the Kantian problematic"
Reply: Scott Roberts: "Re: MD Pure experience and the Kantian problematic"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Feb 13 2005 - 20:51:11 GMT