Re: MD Contradictions

From: Erin (macavity11@yahoo.com)
Date: Thu Mar 24 2005 - 16:01:51 GMT

Next message: Mark Steven Heyman: "Re: MD Nihilism (Punk)"

Previous message: MarshaV: "Re: MD access to Quality"
In reply to: Scott Roberts: "Re: MD Contradictions"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

ANT: the MOQ is guaranteed 100% SOM free.

DMB said:
But the MOQ is empirical from head to toe. It asserts nothing without
evidence.

SCOTT: The idea that the MOQ has somehow
uniquely escaped any a priori argumentation by being empirical "from head to
toe" is a dangerous illusion.

ERIN: I find these fanatical illusions scary too----what is next a statement of "papal/Pirsig infallibility" . Oh wait that is already implicitly suggested by these two nevermind. Thank goodness we have a "special relation to Quality that no one can override"

MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

Next message: Mark Steven Heyman: "Re: MD Nihilism (Punk)"
Previous message: MarshaV: "Re: MD access to Quality"
In reply to: Scott Roberts: "Re: MD Contradictions"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Mar 24 2005 - 16:06:22 GMT