From: Adam Watt (adamwatt@mac.com)
Date: Thu Apr 07 2005 - 23:29:40 BST
On Thursday, April 7, 2005, at 07:47 pm, Mark Steven Heyman wrote:
>
> The point I've been trying to make with Ham is that religious belief
> systems, to the extent that they rely on faith, are very different
> from scientific or philosophical systems. To deny this is pure
> confusion.
Hello,
I thought I'd pick on this point. It may be pure confusion ( seems that
way.. ), but, correct me if I'm
wrong, aren't all 'scientific and philosophical systems' ultimately
based on some degree assumption?
And if so, as I think they are, is relying on faith and relying on
assumption so different?
Adam
>
>
>
> MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
> Mail Archives:
> Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
> Nov '02 Onward -
> http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
> MD Queries -
>
> To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
> http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
>
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries -
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Apr 08 2005 - 00:54:20 BST