From: Mark Steven Heyman (MarkHeyman@infoproconsulting.com)
Date: Sat Apr 30 2005 - 02:42:07 BST
*** WARNING ***
This topic is not directly related to the MOQ though, IMO, the issue
of Quality is certainly involved. Proceed at your own risk!
*** END WARNING ***
On 29 Apr 2005 at 15:58, Platt Holden wrote:
msh said before:
Last I heard, Japan hadn't been moved to Southeast Asia. Would a
quote from Richard Nixon be specific enough?
"The only place you and I disagree . . . is with regard to the
bombing. You're so goddamned concerned about the civilians, and I (in
contrast) don't give a damn. I don't care.". . . "I'd rather use the
nuclear bomb. . . Does that bother you? I just want you to think big."
- Richard Nixon to Secretary of State Henry Kissinger on the
Watergate tapes
platt:
Did I ever claim Nixon never drank too much?
msh:
No. But the tapes contain numerous similar quotes. Are you
suggesting Nixon was drunk from 68 through 72? But I'm not picking
on Nixon alone. If they were tried under the rules of Nuremberg,
every American president since the end of WWII would be hanged...
flabbergasted platt:
That's an idea of such low quality it requires no response.
msh:
Here's the indictment filed against the Nuremberg defendents:
Count One - The Common Plan or Conspiracy to wage an aggressive war
in violation of international law or treaties.
Count Two - Planning, preparation, or waging an aggressive war
Count Three - War Crimes -- violations of the international rules of
war (mistreatment of prisoners of war or civilian populations, the
plunder of private property and the destruction of towns and cities
without military justification). (msh: Now codified as the Geneva
Conventions)
Count Four - Crimes Against Humanity - murder, extermination,
enslavement of civilian populations.
msh:
To anyone interested, I'll be happy to provide historical evidence
and argument in support of the claim that, if they were tried under
the rules of Nuremberg, every American president since the end of
WWII would be hanged.
Or, here's a link or two to get you started in your own
investigation:
http://www.chomsky.info/articles/20041217.htm
http://www.chomsky.info/talks/1990----.htm
But don't take Chomsky's word for it. Track down the history and
prove it to yourself. Or, if you do some investigation and don't
agree, I'll be happy to talk about it here.
Thanks,
Mark Steven Heyman (msh)
--
InfoPro Consulting - The Professional Information Processors
Custom Software Solutions for Windows, PDAs, and the Web Since 1983
Web Site: http://www.infoproconsulting.com
"Thought is only a flash between two long nights, but this flash is everything." --
Henri Poincare'
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Apr 30 2005 - 02:45:44 BST