Re: MD Transubstantiation

From: ian glendinning (psybertron@gmail.com)
Date: Sat Apr 30 2005 - 07:35:54 BST

  • Next message: ian glendinning: "Re: MD Quality and the Nuremberg-Tokyo Tribunals"

    Re-send

    Thanks for your paitence Erin - you clearly have more than I do - I'm
    impressed :-)

    So (IF its of any value),
    No reason to limit what science is permitted to "explain"
    And, in explaining,
    No reason to restrict science to logical-postivist reasoning
    (objective empirical tests of "scientific method" joined-up
    exlcusively with syllogistic logic.)

    That's all I'm claiming - so far - just a level playing field.

    So whether one sees onself as a "scientist", a "philosopher", a
    "theologist", a "poet" or a "fjord designer" - the only test of truth
    is the "quality of explanation".

    Game on.
    Ian

    On 4/29/05, Erin <macavity11@yahoo.com> wrote:

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Apr 30 2005 - 09:31:08 BST