From: Platt Holden (pholden@sc.rr.com)
Date: Sat Jul 09 2005 - 16:26:31 BST
> You appeal to this concept of "non sequitur" whenever you can't address a
> challenge. Perhaps, again, you should look up this term in a dictionary,
> and stop using it is a distraction from having to answer for lapses in
> logic on your part.
From Merriam-Webster on line dictionary:
1: an inference that does not follow from the premises . . .
" 2: a statement (as a response) that does not follow logically from
anything previously said.
> Although, I do realize that this type of "distractive" discouse in endemic
> of talk-radio argumentation techniques.
An unnecessary and unsupported bashing of me not to mention talk radio.
Platt
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Jul 09 2005 - 16:46:25 BST