From: Erin (macavity11@yahoo.com)
Date: Mon Jul 18 2005 - 17:26:56 BST
Ian,
In the idea you refer to does it talk about whether people are becoming more specialized in modern times. Would more specialization be a moving away from a collective "mind" idea or not necessarily?
Erin
, language, etc, and widely shared
world-views arising through them. (Memes for short.)
Ian
(PS when I say collective "mind" in the first clause, I am referring
to the idea of self-conscious thought emerging from something more
than a single biological brain. Sci-Fi for now, but not necessarily
for long.)
On 7/17/05, Paul Turner
wrote:
> Ham, Matt,
>
> >Somebody (Arlo?) quoted Pirsig:
> >"These fill the collective consciousness of all communicating mankind.
> >Every last bit of it."
> >
> >Ham asked:
> >I have two questions concerning this statement:
> >1) What does "collective consciousness" have to do with any of the
> >"analogues" previously quoted?
> >2) Why did Matt Kundert insist to me that he'd never seen the term and had
> >no idea what it meant? (I guess Matt will have to answer that one.)
> >
> >Matt:
> >
> >
> >
> >Pirsig's not talking about some
> >big,
> >ephemeral brain or think-tank that all of us pour and pull our thoughts
> >into
> >and out of. Pirsig's talking about books. He's talking about receiving an
> >education. He's talking about learning the language of the historical
> >culture we were born into. He's talking about learning the analogues upon
> >analogues upon analogues which make up the language of our time. That's
> >the
> >collective consciousness that has grown and changed since the time of the
> >creation of language. One can call it "collective" because it wasn't
> >created by a single source. It was created by many sources over a long
> >time. In fact, we all participate in creating it (or, rather, changing it)
> >simply by using it (which we have no other choice but to--well, at least to
> >remain "sane"). We can call it "collective" because our common educations
> >in the language of our time and place is why we all think in a way enough
> >like our fellows that we can understand each other.
>
> Paul: Exactly. Thanks for spelling this out, Matt. My shorter response to
> Ham at the time was:
>
> "Agreed, there is no collective mind. You are the one big on the existence
> of "mind," Ham, not I. There is, however, peer review. There is education,
> mathematics, language; without which there is no science."
>
> Regards
>
> Paul
>
>
>
>
> MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
> Mail Archives:
> Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
> Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
> MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
>
> To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
> http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
>
>
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jul 18 2005 - 20:38:40 BST