From: Destination Quality (planetquality@hotmail.com)
Date: Fri Feb 28 2003 - 09:07:07 GMT
Subject: Re: MD more than one intellectual level
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 00:58:37 -0000
Joao,
You wrote:
There is no direct communication between two person's minds.
The intellectual level is identical to mind.
A communication between two person's intellectual levels is a social level
pattern.
D:
If you start out with the basis of a subject that stands seperate you will
get trapped, if you consider the intellectual level as the starting point
the problem of the subject evaporates. It is not that minds(in the
traditional sense as you copmprehend and use it) both have an intellectual
level, but part of the intellectual level consists of two minds
participating in it. The intellectual level has you!
>Still no replies. Ok.
>Let me make two additional comments for those who are thinking about this:
>- I think that the closed nature of one's mind is that relevant.
>- Don't identify cooperative (integrative, complying) behavior and
>competitive (assertive, affirmative) behavior with intelectual level
>patterns and social level patterns. Behavior is always social, it is the
>intention that is intellectual.
From a social level perspective there is no intellectual level, there is
just DQ that can either cause growth and generates broader understanding by
latching on the Intellectual level or degenerate(though some people will
certainly disagrre on that opinion), into lower Quality(experience) by
being latched in a form of less quality on the social level or even the
biological level.
9To tap into antother discussion going on, DQ is not indifferent but the
direction of DQ is determined by the construction of the static patterns and
the Quality of the "newness"). Depending on the way the latching takes place
the pattern either evolves or degenerates. The patterns that stand for
behaviour are not determined by the dependance relationship of the subject
to another subject but are depending on the way the are latched and their
receptivity to change.
PS: Platt, did I read correctly that Schopenhauer is one of you favorite
philosophers? Hmm, I assume you have only adapted the concept of "will" and
not all the othere stuff he had to say especially the (post)modern stuff?
just curious.
PS: Matt, I loved your "Confessions" essay, thanks for that
Greetz Davor
_________________________________________________________________
Chatten met je online vrienden via MSN Messenger. http://messenger.msn.nl/
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Feb 28 2003 - 09:07:33 GMT