From: David M (davidint@blueyonder.co.uk)
Date: Thu Nov 10 2005 - 18:05:52 GMT
Hi Scott
I know you like Sheldrake too.
Mechanism only implies a very deep
habit would you not say? Of course
the unconscious seems to be full of
meaning and language as per Freud, Jung, Lacan.
Is SQ then simply the habits DQ has formed?
DM
----- Original Message -----
From: "Scott Roberts" <jse885@localnet.com>
To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 2:08 AM
Subject: Re: MD Looking for the Primary Difference
> David M,
>
> Scott said:
> Ditto all the above. Try getting the key into the car without having a
> concept of what keys do.
>
>
> DM said:
> A question: is this an accurate descriptions of the experience
> or an assumption? Whilst a dynamic realisation of the link
> between key and key hole is required during learning do
> we not move into an unconscious SQ formula after we gain
> familiarity? Intelligence preovides the concepts but they no doubt
> become SQ-like or mechanical you might say.
>
> Scott:
> The unconscious SQ formula is still a concept. Most concepts we use are
> used
> without needing our attention. And I prefer the word "habitual" to
> "mechanical".
>
> - Scott
>
>
>
> MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
> Mail Archives:
> Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
> Nov '02 Onward -
> http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
> MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
>
> To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
> http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
>
>
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 10 2005 - 21:04:09 GMT