Re: MD Undeniable Facts

From: Platt Holden (pholden@sc.rr.com)
Date: Tue Apr 22 2003 - 12:54:04 BST

Next message: Platt Holden: "Re: MD Undeniable Facts"

Previous message: Paul Turner: "Re: MD Metaphysics of Quality: An oxymoron?"
In reply to: Wim Nusselder: "Re: MD Undeniable Facts"
Next in thread: Wim Nusselder: "Re: MD Undeniable Facts"
Reply: Wim Nusselder: "Re: MD Undeniable Facts"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi Wim:

> Maybe we can agree that the MoQ can paradoxically be understood as BOTH an
> absolute metaphysics which values relativity AND a relative metaphysics
> which values absolute statements?

OK by me if you mean the MOQ is relative to other metaphysics like
SOM but absolute in its inner integrity.

Platt

MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

Next message: Platt Holden: "Re: MD Undeniable Facts"
Previous message: Paul Turner: "Re: MD Metaphysics of Quality: An oxymoron?"
In reply to: Wim Nusselder: "Re: MD Undeniable Facts"
Next in thread: Wim Nusselder: "Re: MD Undeniable Facts"
Reply: Wim Nusselder: "Re: MD Undeniable Facts"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Apr 22 2003 - 12:55:22 BST