From: Steve Peterson (peterson.steve@verizon.net)
Date: Tue Jul 29 2003 - 15:24:44 BST
Hi DMB,
> dmb said:
> You haven't given us one good reason why anyone should think Pirsig means
> she does when he says she doesn't.
>
> Steve replied:
> Is this the royal 'us'? I haven't heard anyone else saying that Lila does
> not participate in intellectual patterns of value while at least a couple of
> others have argued against you that she does.
>
> dmb says:
> The word "us" simply refers to the readers.
Oh. Then I suggest that you speak only for yourself on whether my reasons
are good.
>And when was it decided that
> popularity is an appropriate way to assess the value of an idea?
It wasn't. That's why I raised the issue. I was wondering if you thought
we were supposed to be arguing to convince one another or performing for the
benefit of an audience.
>I can't
> help but think this objection has been fabricated as a distraction.
It wasn't.
> After
> the smoke clears I can see that there is still no good reason.
I disagree, and I'm anxious to hear some "good reasons" to support your
interpretation in light of Platt's list of quotes on whether she does or not
which are consistent with my interpretation.
Thanks,
Steve
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 30 2003 - 14:19:11 BST