From: MATTHEW PAUL KUNDERT (mpkundert@students.wisc.edu)
Date: Thu Aug 21 2003 - 21:04:32 BST
> Me (to someone else): [something about the S/O divide]
>
> You: There are no subjects and objects in the MOQ. I sincerely
> want to help.
>
> Me: While I agree that subjects and objects are not primary, I
> nevertheless think that a philosophy is useless if it does not
> account for them, because of X, Y, and Z.
>
> You: Subjects and objects are not primary (plus the quote from ZMM
> on Poincare).
>
> Me: I AGREE with that. If you want to help, why don't you respond
> to my X, Y, and Z concerns?
>
> You: Apparently you haven't read ZMM and Lila. There are no
> subjects and objects in the MOQ.
>
> So do you see why I might have found your responses just a tad
> frustrating -- above all, the opposite of helpful?
Hey, wait. That looks like a half a dozen conversations _I've_ had with Squonk.
Matt
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Aug 21 2003 - 21:06:30 BST