Re: MD Dealing with S/O

• Previous message: Patrick van den Berg: "Re: MD Meaningful cosmology?"
• Maybe in reply to: Scott R: "Re: MD Dealing with S/O"
• Next in thread: Dan Glover: "Re: MD Dealing with S/O"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi Mark,

You said: "If the proper MoQ is that enjoying high social approval, then i
can
identify the proper MoQ at this moment in time. My wish is not to challenge,
but
to work with it. I do that because the MoQ, as i understand it, is good. I
reject interpretations because they are not so nearly as good, as i see
them."

Andy: Your clarification helps. I agree wholeheartedly with the above. I
think
this is the proper approach to take. :-)

Thanks for being patient with me,
Andy

Hello Andy,
I apologise if i have appeared snotty in any respect? I did not intend to be.
Mark :)

MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

• Next message: Steve Peterson: "Re: MD Children and violence"
• Previous message: Patrick van den Berg: "Re: MD Meaningful cosmology?"
• Maybe in reply to: Scott R: "Re: MD Dealing with S/O"
• Next in thread: Dan Glover: "Re: MD Dealing with S/O"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Sep 25 2003 - 23:13:27 BST