From: David MOREY (us@divadeus.freeserve.co.uk)
Date: Thu Oct 02 2003 - 19:15:38 BST
Matt
I don't think that "scientific" is a banned word as long as we recognise
its limitations to absolute claims, I almost think that Pirsig is ironically
using the language of the opposition with respect to a non-SOM
perspective, of course, that's a messy thing to do.
Regards
DM
----- Original Message -----
From: "MATTHEW PAUL KUNDERT" <mpkundert@students.wisc.edu>
To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 9:24 PM
Subject: Re: MD The narrator
> David,
>
> Just can't swallow it. If Pirsig meant longevity, why would he say
"absolute" and "scientific". Why would he use the language of objectivity,
the language of SOM, if he was trying to get rid of it? It seems to me
that, particularly in this passage, that he's trying to co-opt the
objectivity of SOM and say that we can be just as objective about morals as
we can about rocks.
>
> Matt
>
>
>
> MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
> Mail Archives:
> Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
> Nov '02 Onward -
http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
> MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
>
> To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
> http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
>
>
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Oct 02 2003 - 19:17:37 BST