From: David MOREY (us@divadeus.freeserve.co.uk)
Date: Fri Oct 24 2003 - 18:15:11 BST
Scott
Do you think that some sense of 'I'
is prior to subject-object type consciousness?
Because consciousness if often talked about as always
being conscious of 'some-thing'.
regards
David M
----- Original Message -----
From: "Scott R" <jse885@spinn.net>
To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 3:15 AM
Subject: Re: MD Truth (rational enquiry)
> David,
>
> I would not try to define or describe it, just note that I can say "I am".
I
> may in some paradoxical way be mistaken, but then that too is
interesting,
> that is, I can say "I can be mistaken".
>
> - Scott
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David MOREY" <us@divadeus.freeserve.co.uk>
> To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
> Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 2:17 PM
> Subject: Re: MD Truth (rational enquiry)
>
>
> > Hi
> >
> > How are you defining describing self-consciousness?
> >
> > regards
> > David M
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Scott R" <jse885@spinn.net>
> > To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
> > Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 2:25 AM
> > Subject: Re: MD Truth (rational enquiry)
> >
> >
> > > Paul,
> > >
> > > > Paul:
> > > > Yes, unlike the vocabulary of substance based metaphysics, the MOQ
> > > > provides a vocabulary and a context in which to consider a massive
> range
> > > > of human experience, and this may extend to placing everyday
activity
> > > > into an evolutionary context.
> > >
> > > One feature of human experience on which the MOQ is silent is
> > > self-consciousness. In MOQ terms, self-consciousness would need to be
> > > expressed as some SQ being aware of itself. The difference between SQ
> that
> > > is aware of itself and SQ that is not is rather important, I would
> think.
> > > With self-consciousness, SQ (sticking to MOQ terms) has the ability to
> > > create SQ. If one thinks of any SQ (like biological reflexes) as fixed
> > > programs, then SQ that is aware of itself can reflect on such programs
> and
> > > so become a programmer. So the jump in dynamism from SQ that is not
> aware
> > of
> > > itself to that which is, is a jump in kind, not degree.
> > >
> > > Of course, it would be simpler to just call people a mix of DQ and SQ,
> but
> > > the MOQ doesn't allow that.
> > >
> > > - Scott
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
> > > Mail Archives:
> > > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
> > > Nov '02 Onward -
> > http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
> > > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
> > > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
> > Mail Archives:
> > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
> > Nov '02 Onward -
> http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
> > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
> >
> > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
> > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
> >
>
>
>
> MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
> Mail Archives:
> Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
> Nov '02 Onward -
http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
> MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
>
> To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
> http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
>
>
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Oct 24 2003 - 18:54:46 BST