Re: MD MOQ Discuss Rules

From: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com
Date: Wed Nov 05 2003 - 17:04:36 GMT

  • Next message: MATTHEW PAUL KUNDERT: "Re: MD MOQ Discuss Rules"

    In a message dated 11/5/03 2:01:35 AM GMT Standard Time,
    horse@darkstar.uk.net writes:

    > Hi All
    >
    > Platt's quite correct to point out that the number of posts per person per
    > day rule (3) is being
    > ignored by some. It should also be pointed out that rules 4 and 6 are
    > ignored on a regular
    > basis.
    > These are:
    > 4) Members should reproduce only the relevant parts of any previous message
    > to which they
    > are responding.
    >
    >

    Hello Horse,
    Personally, i find this is making contributing to discussions virtually a
    no-go. Why? Well, precisely because as soon as one begins a thread, it is
    hijacked and goes off on a totally different tangent to that intended.
    Recently, everything is turned into a bloody 'Rortython,' for example, with
    posts going totally OTT in number. Get a grip on it please? (Ooo-eerrrrrrr
    madame! The post quotient i mean!)
    Mark

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Nov 05 2003 - 17:13:07 GMT