Re: MD intellectual level

From: David MOREY (us@divadeus.freeserve.co.uk)
Date: Wed Dec 31 2003 - 20:01:28 GMT

  • Next message: Platt Holden: "Re: MD Battle of Values"

     Hi Bo

    -taken this over to the discuss area as I have gone
    a bit off the original subject:
    >
    > I have no doubt that we are attacking the same
    > thing, I was only trying to check where you were
    > coming from and cover the idealist side. I am very
    > happy to switch to the SQ/DQ dualism rather than SO.
    > I am happy to talk about an intellectual level in as
    > far as this is full of static patterns, i.e various communicable
    > ideas/theories/etc, and that has its associated value. But it
    > is, of course, also on the move, for example, the MOQ
    > as a theory has emerged. But also existentialism, Bergson,
    > Whitehead of course. These are intellectual achievements
    > but are not easily or completely associated with SOM.
    > Does this fall in with what you are saying?
    >
    > regards
    > David M
    >
    >
    >
    > ----- Original Message -----
    > From: <skutvik@online.no>
    > To: <moq_focus@moq.org>
    > Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 11:02 AM
    > Subject: Re: MF Discussion Topic for December 2003
    >
    >
    > > David M. and Foci.
    > >
    > > 28 Dec. You said:
    > >
    > > Bo prev:
    > > > NOTA BENE!! In the said example above intellects S/O value
    > > > (objectivity-over-subjectivity) is plain to see, so plain that I wonder
    > > > how anyone can avoid seeing it. Just as obvious is emotions as the
    > > > social "expression" and reason as intellect's, and in light of the
    > > > dependency issue one sees emotions' role as what underpins
    > > > reason. Why you consider this aspect of the MOQ as imperfect is
    > > > very strange.
    > >
    > > > DM: I agree that SOM, which implies only the distinction, generally
    > > > becomes the value "objectivity-over-subjectivity" but this is not
    > > > true of the great German idealist tradition that is the other way round
    > and
    > > > has a great deal to say about reason and is more the concern of European
    > > > post-modernism than the "objectivity-over-subjectivity" that is really
    > the
    > > > value of modern secular techno-scientific society.
    > >
    > > That the subject/object-METAPHYSICS has 2 - two - components
    > > an idealist and a materialist one I have harped on since God knows
    > > when, but the SOM removed of its metaphysical 'M' and given the
    > > role of MOQ's intellectual level ...means the VALUE of the S/O
    > > distinction. Neither the idealist nor the materialist is "right" any
    > > longer because the rightness is taken over by the MOQ.
    > >
    > > > I think that your formual
    > > > intellect=SOM I find very odd when I have been educated mainly in the
    > German idealist
    > > > tradition in the humanities
    > >
    > > I see your point perfectly and at the start of my SOL "campaign" -
    > > when the formula was "intellect=SOM" - it could look as if I had
    > > overlooked the idealist half, but with the "intellect=the value of the
    > > S/O distinction" form it aught to be crystal clear.
    > >
    > > > but with dualism turned materialist in the sciences. I
    > > > agrre very much with Pirsig with respect to science, but there is a big
    > tradition in the
    > > > European humanities (also some US pragmatism) that is not based on the
    > > > "objectivity-over-subjectivity" value.
    > >
    > > I know, but please David: It's the subject/object dualism (here in
    > > the idealist/materialist form) that the MOQ says is WRONG ...and
    > > what it is supposed to replace with its own DQ/SQ dualism.
    > > Haven't you understood this elementary fact yet?
    > >
    > > > We have been happy in Europe to talk alot ion the humanties about the
    > > > subjective-experiencing-self over the
    > objective-groundless-limited-sciences.
    > >
    > > Exactly. ;-)
    > >
    > > Wishing you all a Happy New year
    > > Bo
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    > > Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_focus/
    > > MF Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    > >
    > > To unsubscribe from moq_focus follow the instructions at:
    > > http://www.moq.org/mf/subscribe.html
    > >
    > >
    >

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Dec 31 2003 - 20:07:54 GMT