From: RycheWorld@aol.com
Date: Tue Feb 17 2004 - 18:46:13 GMT
In a message dated 2/17/2004 6:55:30 AM Pacific Standard Time,
pholden@sc.rr.com writes:
Perhaps the difference between taste and informed judgment is best
illustrated by comparing the pictures I have hanging on the walls in my
home compared to what adorns the walls of the Tate Museum in London or the
Metropolitan Museum in New York. I don't think people would pay to see my
collection. :-)
Platt,
In this statement you are saying that your pictures aren't worth as much
as anything in the Tate museum. My question is that, since society sends the
message, a distorted message I believe, that your art is not worth "as much"
doesn't that almost create a static pattern? Now we wind up "keeping up with the
Jones's" and are wrapped in one big, huge, enormous static pattern - agreeing
with everyone else on something that, in essence, cannot be judged to the
point of accuracy.
What do you think?
Dan
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Feb 17 2004 - 18:47:47 GMT