From: David Morey (us@divadeus.freeserve.co.uk)
Date: Tue Apr 06 2004 - 18:46:33 BST
Hi
I like to think of it less as lost and more as broken out of.
Bhaskar in his philosophy of science argues for an underlying
unity below all progress in scientific thought, or any successful
communication, also love, art appreciations, etc.
regards
David M
----- Original Message -----
From: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com
To: moq_discuss@moq.org
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 4:12 PM
Subject: Re: MD relationship of SQ and DQ
In a message dated 4/4/04 9:20:09 PM GMT Daylight Time, us@divadeus.freeserve.co.uk writes:
Can an initial unity between them be explained?
Clearly they interact in some way in everything that
we describe as an event.
Hello David M,
I wonder if you ever got around to reading, The edge of Chaos?
There, you will find a description of precisely the interaction you are thinking about?
In a diagrammatic form it may be represented like this:
Event stream - DQ (SODV) --------> Coherence <-------- DQ as evolutionary goal (Lila)
Coherence is close to, and exceptionally the One, Tao, the way, 'it,' Unity, Mystic reality.
All this is found now, in activity where the self is lost.
Native Americans do this well.
Here, the Quality of ZMM and the DQ/SQ conceptual MoQ touch.
All the best,
Mark
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Apr 06 2004 - 19:11:22 BST