From: storeyd (storeyd@bc.edu)
Date: Fri Apr 16 2004 - 20:31:54 BST
To defer to Wilber, I think the key is to recognize that internal-external and
individual-collective do not translate categorically; in other words,
individuals have internals AND externals, as so collectives...however, the
internal-collective (i.e., the cultural or political or social) has no locus
of sentient intelligence, it is an intersubjective network of meaning/value
SHARED WITHIN many individual worldspaces...the point is that the "collective
will" is really just an effect of an individual mind, a conceptual construct
assented to by you or me. the exteriors of the collective are the buildings
we're sitting in, the computers we're typing on, the words with which we're
communicating, etc., but the interal component of that exists only in our
shared continuum, the cultural worldspace we co-create and co-enact. just an
offering,
-Dave
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Apr 16 2004 - 20:53:54 BST