LS Re: Intelligence vs Intellect.


Hettinger (hettingr@iglou.com)
Tue, 21 Oct 1997 16:53:20 +0100


 Gene Kofman wrote:

> <snip>
> When we move from one society/culture to another we still continue for
> quite awhile to follow social patterns of the society we left behind. Of
> course, many of the patterns don't work in the new social environment,
> which brings about a lot of DQ opportunities.
> <snip>

Does anybody see a distinction here between DQ, the "source of all things, the
pre-intellecutal cutting edge of reality" and the instance of DQ that Gene
mentioned above--a "contained" type of DQ that exists because of the
interaction of different static social PoV's (each of which has a different
mix of influence of the others, and therefore a somewhat different
"direction", but still, in general, is somehow bound to be part of the
direction that the social level as a whole shares)? Something that would
seem, to all appearances from within the social level, to be indistinguishable
from DQ, but from without would appear to be a small dynamic influence within
the general influence of static social patterns?

(I can see that I need to get a handle on this "direction" concept that I want
to use without being able to demonstrate it. Doug, are my contexts clear at
all?)

Maggie

PS hmm... maybe I just defined social quality.

--
post message - mailto:skwok@spark.net.hk
unsubscribe/queries - mailto:diana@asiantravel.com
homepage - http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Forum/4670



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu May 13 1999 - 16:42:06 CEST