Magnus Berg (qmgb@bull.se)
Fri, 16 Jan 1998 18:23:58 +0100
Hi Diana and Squad
A few comments about the principles.
> 3. Dynamic Quality and static quality.
> The best way to divide Quality is into patterns of Dynamic and static
> value or experience. Dynamic Quality is pure unfiltered experience.
> Static quality is stable distinguishable experience. Dynamic Quality
> creates the world; static quality preserves it. Dynamic Quality is more
> pleasing than static quality. Dynamic Quality is more moral than static
> quality.
You can't compare DQ and SQ, it's like comparing green-ness and mass.
Too much DQ is chaos, too much SQ is stagnation. Why not cut the
principle after "Dynamic Quality creates the world; static quality
preserves it."? I like that.
Besides, to say that DQ is more moral than SQ is to define an aspect
of DQ, and we can't have that.
> 9. Evolution.
> To create ever higher levels of awareness, Dynamic Quality strives for
> freedom from all static patterns. Freedom is the highest Good in the
> Metaphysics of Quality. Life is migration of static patterns of quality
> toward Dynamic Quality.
The same goes for freedom. Total freedom equals chaos.
Magnus
-- post message - mailto:lilasqd@hkg.com unsubscribe/queries - mailto:diana@asiantravel.com homepage - http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Forum/4670
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu May 13 1999 - 16:42:37 CEST