Jonathan B. Marder (marder@agri.huji.ac.il)
Wed, 10 Jun 1998 17:19:28 +0100
Hi Squad,
A horrific thought occurred to me this morning - that I may have split
DQ into two.
Then I reread Fintan's contribution and saw that he had already done it!
FINTAN wrote
>Is there some kind of special award for legitimately bringing up the
>subject of PUBIC hair in a philosophy forum. If so, then put my name
>down, because it impacts on the sentient v non-sentient DQ.
********************
This is deeply offensive - to those (i.e. the Squad) who hold the unity
of
DQ in such high esteem.
My own thought on the possible DQ split used different language.
If I find something I am looking for, DQ is the flash of recognition
when
I find it - a matching to a well-defined pattern.
But what about the DQ which makes us notice the dramatic or the bizarre?
It's bizarre because it fails to match a pattern. ... or is NO pattern
also a pattern?
Comments please.
Jonathan
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu May 13 1999 - 16:43:21 CEST