Nicholas Szekeres (nszekeres@hotmail.com)
Thu, 9 Jul 1998 18:15:24 +0100
thank you for the invite! this is my understanding of DQ/SQ. by your
definition DQ=energy and SQ=matter. DQ is the wave as understood in
physics and SQ is the wave collapse. DQ is indepent of our observation
whereas SQ is the creation of our realty resulting from our observation
of DQ.the question is are we the bridge between DQ and SQ?
>Reply-To: lilasqd@hkg.com
>Date: Wed, 08 Jul 1998 13:43:04 -0400
>From: Sojourner <sojourner@vt.edu>
>To: Multiple recipients of <lilasqd@mail.hkg.com>
>Subject: LS Re: Explain the Dynamic-Static split
>
>At 05:11 PM 7/8/98 +0100, you wrote:
>>Hi Nicolas
>>
>>"i have been reading the ls for the past couple of days and i have
>>never heard such a bunch of crap in a long time. the buddha simply
>>held up a flower."
>>
>
>I have... but then again I listen to the radio.
>
>>Whichever is the case why not post some of your own thoughts
>>regarding the MoQ and the current subject (DQ/SQ Split). Being
>>negative and merely slagging off others is not too constructive -
>>then again holding up a flower doesn't help too much either in
>>discussing the MoQ.
>>
>
>It does for me... but Nicolas' wrist gets in the way. As for DQ/SQ
>split how about:
>
>DQ = energy
>SQ = matter
>
>?
>
>Have a DQ/SQ banana split with a side of logic fudge,
>and don't forget mystic chocolate magic shell on top!
>
>
>
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu May 13 1999 - 16:43:27 CEST