Kevin,
I have a question here, not as much about your thesis as about a problem
I've always had with the Quality=Reality=Morality idea.
You wrote:
1. "Pirsig has create a value-centered metaphysics meaning Quality = Reality =
Morality."
and furthermore:
2. "Quality, reality, and morality can be separated on an
intellectual level into two groups - static and Dynamic Quality. Static
equals divided realities, Dynamic requals the Undivided Reality."
I wonder:
Why is "Morality" a part of this equality. It always seemed to me more
correct that-- Quality=Reality... and they can be separated on an
intellectual level into two groups - static and Dynamic Quality (or static
and Dynamic Reality). Static equals divided realities, Dynamic requals the
Undivided Reality. Morality is the very framework (or rules or codes) which
divides the Undivided reality (rather than actually being synonomous with
the undivided.) I'm not sure if I've presented this question clearly
enough but... What do you think?
all Good,
Rick
MOQ Online - http://www.moq.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Jan 17 2002 - 13:08:43 GMT