Chris Lofting wrote:
>
> JoVo, my emphasis on my websites is more on what is BEHIND these typologies
> IOW each typology is 'different' in the way descriptions are expressed but
> behind them all is a methodology that is, at the general level, the SAME in
> all of the our species.
>
> Understand THAT level and all else is seen as particularisations,
> localisations, of a general form of categorisations.
>
> This includes converting dichotomy-derived to trichotomy-derived and the
> reverse...
>
> best,
Hi Chris, Hi All,
I was referring to the above table (of the referred page), the MBTI-Enneagram,
that gives one possible decription what kind of general types can be found in
any society and you yourself refer to the Keirsey typology as well, isn't it?
It maybe, that I did not use it in the way it is meant to be, but IMO I did it
in an also legal way and Danila seems to be of at least a nearby opinion.
I must admit that, however greatly interested in your posts, that I have until
now - though I spend a lot of time on it, especially your articles on this list
- have not understood what exactly your, well, impetus is.
For example I don't understand, what you would like to express with the above,
apart from having misunderstood you. It may be, that I'm not as smart as you
:-), but it seems I'm not the only one who has some problems to understand the
meaning of your writings.
With best wishes, hoping for a clarifying answer on your part,
regards
JoVo
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@wasted.demon.nl
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:00:53 BST