> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-moq_discuss@venus.co.uk
MD
> JON
> >So I think it's fair to say Pirsig considers morality to be as real as
> >gravity. I wonder how many members agree that Morality and
> Quality are the
> >same thing? Platt, you agree. Horse agrees. Jonathan agrees (i
> think!). 3WD
> >I'm not sure about. Diana I believe thinks they are different,
> and does Ian,
> >Dennis, and probably Glenn. If I'm mistaken, please let me know.
> We should do
> >a survey on this issue. We really should.
I'm skimming and not really following this thread, but just for the record I'm very much of the opinion that quality and morality are the same. I despair when I see people questioning the wisdom of Pirsig's Q=M because I really think it's the heart of the MOQ. Whilst I have quibbles about the four levels and even the dynamic-static split, the idea that reality=morality=quality remains rock solid and fascinating to me.
I think I've written about it several times though ... can't help wondering why I've been misunderstood.
Diana
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@wasted.demon.nl
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:00:59 BST