In a message dated 6/30/2001 12:44:23 AM Central Daylight Time,
dscarlett@optushome.com.au writes:
<<
He also wouldn't have repeated his actions if he was dead. The difference is
that it would be considerably cheaper to execute him than to lock him up for
life. Wouldn't that money be better spend funding hospitals or such?
>>
Nope. With the appeals process and court cases, keeping a prisoner alive is
cheaper than executing him. And why do you say 'he wouldn't have repeated
his actions?' Locked up or dead, there's no way he could have repeated his
actions.
Rasheed
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:01:24 BST