Re: MD I am an American

From: SQUONKSTAIL@aol.com
Date: Sun Sep 16 2001 - 06:50:55 BST


Hello All.
The term, 'Terrorism' is being used in connection with NY and Washington.
I've had a problem with that which has been niggling for days.

Perhaps, 'Provocation' would be better?
World conflict is that which is being provoked and the US is walking blindly
right into it.

Terrorism works more subtlety and to more psychological effect than blowing
up 5,000 people at one strike.
Wake up people! This is going to become dangerous, and Tamim should be
listened to.
Right now we need restraint; i understand that may sound indecisive to many,
but the conflict of values in this situation cannot be resolved using brute
force: History has all the warning signs one could wish for, and yet again
they are not being heeded.

My fear at this time is that the current president of the US views life as
one big baseball game with one winner and one loser. Life is rarely that
simple?

Squonk.

In a message dated 9/16/01 1:58:12 AM GMT Daylight Time, HisSheedness@aol.com
writes:

<< Subj: Re: MD I am an American
 Date: 9/16/01 1:58:12 AM GMT Daylight Time
 From: HisSheedness@aol.com
 Sender: owner-moq_discuss@venus.co.uk
 Reply-to: moq_discuss@moq.org
 To: moq_discuss@moq.org
 
 Everyone,
 
 Here is an account sent to me by a friend which may help all of you gain a
 better understanding of the current situation in Afghanistan.
 
 
 I've been hearing a lot of talk about "bombing Afghanistan
 back to the
 Stone Age." Ronn Owens, on KGO Talk Radio today, allowed
 that this would
 mean killing innocent people, people who had nothing to do
 with this
 atrocity, but "we're at war, we have to accept collateral
 damage. What
 else can we do?" Minutes later I heard some TV pundit
 discussing whether
 we "have the belly to do what must be done."
 
 And I thought about the issues being raised especially hard
 because I am
 from Afghanistan, and even though I've lived here for 35
 years I've never
 lost track of what's going on there. So I want to tell
 anyone who will
 listen how it all looks from where I'm standing.
 
 I speak as one who hates the Taliban and Osama Bin Laden.
 There is no
 doubt in my mind that these people were responsible for the
 atrocity in
 New York. I agree that something must be done about those
 monsters.
 
 But the Taliban and Ben Laden are not Afghanistan. They're
 not even the
 government of Afghanistan. The Taliban are a cult of
 ignorant psychotics
 who took over Afghanistan in 1997. Bin Laden is a political
 criminal with
 a plan. When you think Taliban, think Nazis. When you think
 Bin Laden,
 think Hitler. And when you think "the people of Afghanistan"
 think "the
 Jews in the concentration camps." It's not only that the
 Afghan people
 had nothing to do with this atrocity. They were the first
 victims of the
 perpetrators. They would exult if someone would come in
 there, take out
 the Taliban and clear out the rats nest of international
 thugs holed up in
 their country.
 
 Some say, why don't the Afghans rise up and overthrow the
 Taliban? The
 answer is, they're starved, exhausted, hurt, incapacitated,
 suffering. A
 few years ago, the United Nations estimated that there are
 500,000
 disabled orphans in Afghanistan--a country with no economy,
 no
 food. There are millions of widows. And the Taliban has
 been burying
 these widows alive in mass graves. The soil is littered
 with land mines,
 the farms were all destroyed by the Soviets. These are a
 few of the
 reasons why the Afghan people have not overthrown the
 Taliban.
 
 We come now to the question of bombing Afghanistan back to
 the Stone Age.
 Trouble is, that's been done. The Soviets took care of it
 already. Make
 the Afghans suffer? They're already suffering. Level their
 houses? Done.
 Turn their schools into piles of rubble? Done. Eradicate
 their hospitals?
 Done. Destroy their infrastructure? Cut them off from
 medicine and
 health care? Too late. Someone already did all that.
 
 New bombs would only stir the rubble of earlier bombs.
 Would they at
 least get the Taliban? Not likely. In today's Afghanistan,
 only the
 Taliban eat, only they have the means to move around.
 They'd slip away
 and hide. Maybe the bombs would get some of those disabled
 orphans, they
 don't move too fast, they don't even have wheelchairs. But
 flying over
 Kabul and dropping bombs wouldn't really be a strike against
 the criminals
 who did this horrific thing. Actually it would only be
 making common cause
 with the Taliban--by raping once again the people they've
 been raping all
 this time
 
 So what else is there? What can be done, then? Let me now
 speak with true
 fear and trembling. The only way to get Bin Laden is to go
 in there with
 ground troops. When people speak of "having the belly to do
 what needs to
 be done" they're thinking in terms of having the belly to
 kill as many as
 needed. Having the belly to overcome any moral qualms about
 killing
 innocent people. Let's pull our heads out of the sand.
 What's actually on
 the table is Americans dying. And not just because some
 Americans would
 die fighting their way through Afghanistan to Bin Laden's
 hideout. It's
 much bigger than that folks. Because to get any troops to
 Afghanistan,
 we'd have to go through Pakistan. Would they let us? Not
 likely. The
 conquest of Pakistan would have to be first. Will other
 Muslim nations
 just stand by? You see where I'm going. We're flirting with
 a world war
 between Islam and the West.
 
 And guess what: that's Bin Laden's program. That's exactly
 what he wants.
 That's why he did this. Read his speeches and statements.
 It's all right
 there. He really believes Islam would beat the west. It
 might seem
 ridiculous, but he figures if he can polarize the world into
 Islam and the
 West, he's got a billion soldiers. If the west wreaks a
 holocaust in
 those lands, that's a billion people with nothing left to
 lose, that's
 even better from Bin Laden's point of view. He's probably
 wrong, in the
 end the west would win, whatever that would mean, but the
 war would last
 for years and millions would die, not just theirs but ours.
 Who has the
 belly for that? Bin Laden does. Anyone else?
 
 Tamim Ansary
>>

MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:01:30 BST