DMB, all
As usual, strong on bombastic rhetoric, short on anything else.
> Surely the distinction between plants rights and the Bill of Rights has not
> escaped you?
Surely it has not, the point is that this distinction continues to elude
many who use emotional dramatization in hopes of achieving the political
goal of converting "unalienable rights" into lesser, legislated
"rights". Legislated "rights" are similar to progressive taxation they
take "rights" from many in the hopes for protecting the "rights" of a
few. But at the end of the day no one is better, all have less freedom.
> How [do] you defecate and talk about rights at the same time?
As opposed to talking defecation about rights, of which you are the
undeniable master?
Sometimes it is necessary to get downright silly to try and convey a
point, but sometimes when faced with unbendable bias, even that doesn't
work. Something about... none so blind as those who will not see. Others
have made the major points against your postition and if past
experiences is any indication there is no middle ground.
3WD
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:01:53 BST