>===== Original Message From moq_discuss@moq.org =====
I have to admit that it was a little bit sarcastic but this is the kind
>of response I expect to hear from MOQers. Sorry.
>
NO APOLOGY NECESSARY,I HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH SARCASM; I JUST HATED NOT KNOWING
WHETHER IT WAS SARCASTIC OR NOT; HOW ARE YOU DISTINGUISHING YOURSELF FROM
THOSE INFAMOUS "MOQers"?
>I couldn't do it justice. I only read the first two chapters.
I DIDN'T WANT A SUMMARY OF THE BOOK JUST WHAT HE SAID IN THE CHAPTER ABOUT
ALL THE WORDS WITH A PREFIX MISSING IN THE DICTIONARY. I WAS CURIOUS IF IT
ALSO WAS A SARCASTIC REASON BUT YOU WERE BEING TOO POLITE TO SAY.
>All words are made up.
OK, I CAN ASSURE YOU IT WAS NOT MADE UP BY JUNG OR ME. IF YOU WANT I CAN TRY
AND DO A SUMMARY OF HOW IT DEVELOPED BUT IT INVOLVED THINGS LIKE LEARNING
SANSKRIT, TALKING WITH EINSTEIN, AND OTHER "GOOFY" STUFF) (YES THAT IS A
LITTLE SARCASTIC)
>As for Jung, I'm in agreement with the person who wrote the essay
>under your signature when she/he implied at the end that synchronicity
>was a goofy idea.
>
ACTUALLY THE AUTHOR SAID "To those -- like me -- who have a taste for goofy
ideas, this one has a definite charm."
JUNG WAS A PRETTY MYSTICAL GUY BUT SOME PEOPLE WHO THINK MYSTICISM IS TOO
GOOFY STILL LIKE JUNG BUT DEMYSTIFY HIS INTERPRETATION BY INTERPRETING HIS
ARCHETYPES AS A HISTORICAL INHERETENCE (OR GENETIC INTERPRETATION). PERHAPS
THIS TYPE OF INTERPRETATION MAY APPEAR LESS GOOFY.
PERSONALLY,I LIKE HOW JUNG APPEALS TO GOOFY AND NONGOOFY SCHOLARS.
ERIN
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:01:54 BST