I don't want to weigh in on one side or another. I
just wanted to point out that if one is saying
dynamic, and the other is saying static, and both are
in agreement that the other is right, then there are
two different contexts being discussed. You aren't
realy discussing the same thing.
Thanks!
-Jerome
--- Wim Nusselder <wim.nusselder@antenna.nl> wrote:
> Dear Jerome,
>
> You can find the context of my 19/3 17:24 +0100
> quotes at
>
http://www.antenna.nl/wim.nusselder/moq/SocialProgressLinks.htm
> or via the
> archives at
> http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
> Roger's statements of 10/2 16:13 -0500 that social
> quality can be both
> relative and absolute and dynamic as well as static
> was just meant to make
> sure that we are NOT going to make a lot of fuss
> about such words.
>
> With friendly greetings,
>
> Wim
>
>
>
> MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
> Mail Archive -
> http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
> MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
>
> To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the
> instructions at:
> http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Sports - live college hoops coverage
http://sports.yahoo.com/
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:01:59 BST