To Sam, Lawry, Jonathan and Erin
From: Rog
Sam:
A truly dynamic MoQ breakthrough would probably involve not having two
separate states - but I can't see either side agreeing to that.
Rog:
I can't see how a solution could be of high quality if it wasn't pragmatic
(ie doable). In other words, I agree with most of your first four points on
the social level. It is indeed unreasonable to think that two parties this
far apart can coexist in one society in harmony. I believe that they can
eventually live in harmony as separate states. I could be wrong though. If
so, I expect one side will indeed obliterate the other (kinda like cowboys
and Indians)
Erin:
"..is the higher quality group responsible for lower quality group?"
Rog:
The highest quality solution maximizes quality for all groups, imo. This
doesn't make one side "responsible," but it does point out which behaviors
on either side (or on our external view) are of a "responsible" nature. I
could be wrong though...
Rog
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:14 BST