Hi, David & Platt,
>From Platt: Hi David B:
David posted this:
> >Language at the social level______VS______Language-dervied
> >intellectual
> > level
> >
> > thinking..................................philosophizing
> > understanding.............................epistemology
> > myth making...............................comparative mythology
> > writing a poem............................literary deconstruction
> > religious doctrines.......................comparative religious studies
> > speaking a language.......................linguistic analysis
> > party politics..................................political science
> > counting and accounting..........................algebra and calculus
> >reading a newspaper ......................media analysis
> > Johnny carson.............................david letterman
>
Platt's response:
> Am I correct in concluding that you believe the intellectual level
consists
> of college professors and academic papers? God help us all if that is
> the case.
>
Gary's response:
Wow, I agree with Platt. But I just realized that I had read David's list
thinking it was saying the exact opposite. I somehow thought that the left
hand was the Intellectual (individual process) Level and the right hand list
was the Social (collective process) Level. Therefore: David please help.
Did you really mean to post that
Thinking was Social and philosophizing was Intellectual Level? I hope not.
I hope you just goofed and typed the labels backward. Please, please tell
us that was what happen.
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:18 BST