--- 3dwavedave <dlt44@ipa.net> wrote: > Andre
>
> > what do you think? If anything, what is wrong with
> > Taoism?
>
> Taoism is a religion, with all relevant and
> irrelevant historical baggage.
> If the MoQ, in part, is an attempt to mediate or
> forge a worldview that
> is sufficently broad to encompass all patterns of
> religious value,
> claiming it is aligned with one particular pattern
> assures it's failure
> in this attempt.
Taoism is Taoism, with all its baggage. MoQ is MoQ
with all *its* baggage. I see no necessity to bring in
religion just to complicate things. The issue was, as
I understand it, with the baggage of MoQ ... in that
it is heavily ridden with SOM notions.
With both MoQ and Taoism removed of their respective
baggage ... I feel that are the same.
André
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
http://uk.my.yahoo.com
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:20 BST