27/6 7:38 am Erin:
>Hi Squonk,
>I have serious doubts whether a person can experience the NOW, I think
>it would be too overwhelming.
>I am not sure what it means when you say epistemology is dead but
>any info would be interesting.
27/6 11:20 am Elliott:
>MoQ transcneds and includes SOM, if AI must be based on SOM and
>cannot achieve MOQ or mystical logic then it is a lower evolutionary
>product, not a higher one.
SOM is a logical deduction from a theory of knowledge called abstraction.
MOQ is also based on a theory of knowledge. We experience DQ, we experience
the existence of undefined moral orders, we experience purpose. Quality is
value! I have three brains. Abstraction is a theory of knowledge which
only applies to the defined, Static Quality. It seems then that I have an
incomplete theory of knowledge, with only abstraction covering the defined.
I have imagined theories of knowledge necessary to explain my other
experiences. I have an instinct by which I experience DQ, which then
progresses to abstraction necessary for defined words. I can be certain of
definitions if I trust. Logic! I have an instinctive grace by which I
experience the transcendent now existence. My experience is certain, no
words possible to describe the experience except by metaphor. Metaphysics!
I have a third instinct for the existing purpose. Again my experience is
certain, no words possible to describe the experience except by metaphor.
Revelation! Is my awareness only of one experience, with the other two
being subconscious? I know not what I do! The first shall be last and the
last first. Good!
Joe
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:24 BST