>Erin:
>>Why I said your definition of teological is creative is because
>>you keep making the goal a designer just so you can argue
>>teleological = creationism point.
>
>I never said that teleology and creationism were equivalent. In fact I
>said they weren't. My justification that he "happily supports
>creationism" is that creationism is the only rival of evolution that is
>teleologically based. What else could he be talking about?
>Glenn
>
Glenn,
Did you not read my Tao does not equal God example? You may not explicitly
write creationism = teleological but you
interchange them so freely that you implicitly imply it.
Such as your statement above, what else could he possible be talking
about then creationism when he mentions a teleological rival!!!
Erin
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:25 BST