Erin:
>Did you not read my Tao does not equal God example? You may not explicitly
>write creationism = teleological but you
>interchange them so freely that you implicitly imply it.
I don't think so. The MOQ is teleologically based as well but I would
never say it is equivalent to teleology. The context of Pirsig's quote
refers to rival camps in the evolution debate. He may have issues with
other aspects of creationism but he doesn't mention them. The fact that he
grew up in the American mid-west, where creation science is very strong,
makes me think he has some affinity for it.
Glenn
__________________________________________________________________
Your favorite stores, helpful shopping tools and great gift ideas. Experience the convenience of buying online with Shop@Netscape! http://shopnow.netscape.com/
Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com/
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:25 BST