Andre,
André wrote:
>
> I did confuse. Ah well. I'll try again.
>
> Assertion: There are no eternally true static patterns.
> Static means unchanging.
> If change is eternal then it is static and eternal.
But, though there are static patterns of change, change is not a static
pattern. It is not itself observable, rather it is a word in my
metaphysics. (Also, Pirsig sometimes used the word "stable" instead of
"static". I don't think he meant to imply that "static patterns" were
absolutely fixed. Every bite of an apple is slightly different, but that
does not keep us from noting a similarity.)
- Scott
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:27 BST