RE: MD Creationism.

From: Lawrence DeBivort (debivort@umd5.umd.edu)
Date: Tue Jul 23 2002 - 20:45:10 BST


Actually, key aspects of both genetic and evolutionary dynamics ARE test-
and provable, using short-life species, such as fruit flies.

Lawry

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-moq_discuss@venus.co.uk [mailto:owner-moq_discuss@venus.co.uk]On
Behalf Of SQUONKSTAIL@aol.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 3:19 PM
To: moq_discuss@moq.org
Subject: Re: MD Creationism.

In a message dated 7/23/02 3:03:00 PM GMT Daylight Time, pholden@sc.rr.com
writes:

Hi Jonathan:

> I still maintain that "objectivity" in science is not philosophical, but
> empirical - you "prove" a result to be objective by proving it to be
> reproducible (for different observers).

No need to remind you but I will anyway that Darwin's theory is not
reproducible and thus not provable by science's own standard of proof.

Viruses evolve immunity to antibiotics.

MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:28 BST