>ROG:
>I have no problem with recognizing that there are value attractors in
>evolution. I am OK with the causation-as-evolution angle too. No teleology
>or mystical purposes are required for either.
ERIN: You are confusing me here. You say you have no problem that there
are value attractors? So you don't have a problem with "Pirsig saw that
empiricism could be viewed 'better' as B values precondition A."
Why is this not teleological?
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:29 BST